Abuse Allegations Revive Woody Allen’s Trial By Media
Filed by KOSU News in US News.
February 7, 2014
A debate is raging anew over accusations that comedian and director Woody Allen sexually abused his daughter more than two decades ago.
Allen was never charged, but his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow, has revived her allegations, as have her famous mother, Mia Farrow, and brother Ronan Farrow.
The story involves celebrity, trauma and a battle fought in the press and on social media.
Back in mid-January, amid the broadcast of the Golden Globe Awards, actor Emma Stone helped pay tribute to Allen’s career. She called him “a genius who takes chances and never compromises his vision.”
That was enough for Mia Farrow, Allen’s former movie co-star and romantic partner for a dozen years until their relationship ended in the early 1990s.
As the tribute came on, Farrow tweeted, “Time to grab some ice cream,” followed later by one that said, “Golden Globe tribute showed contempt for [Farrow] & all abuse survivors.”
In his own tweet, their son Ronan Farrow wrote, “Did they put the part where a woman publicly confirmed he molested her at age 7 before or after Annie Hall?”
Twitter erupted with people taking sides — as they did years ago as the Farrow-Allen relationship imploded, when Mia Farrow found provocative pictures Allen had taken of her adopted teenaged daughter Soon-Yi Previn. Previn was past the age of consent at the time the pictures were taken and was not Allen’s daughter.
Despite the outcry, Allen and Previn later married.
Allegations Via Columns, Defense Via Blog
Robert Weide, who made a PBS documentary about Allen’s career, remains friendly with the director. “We can always have the discussion — as though it were our business — whether Woody had any right to get involved [with] Soon Yi,” he says. “And I understand that people are creeped out by it because of the age difference and because she was the daughter of Woody’s girlfriend. But that’s not a criminal offense.”
Writing in the Daily Beast, Weide emphasized a finding from experts at Yale-New Haven Hospital, who concluded that Dylan probably hadn’t been abused. He also noted that a Connecticut prosecutor had been rebuked for saying there was proof of abuse, even as he decided not to prosecute Allen.
“In the aftermath of the famous tweets from Ronan and Mia the night of the Golden Globe Awards,” Weide says, “I went online and I was seeing all the Internet chatter about it — and found that people were still making the same mistakes that I had heard people make for 20 years.”
Dylan Farrow, now 28 and using a different name, first revived her allegations last fall in a profile of her mother in Vanity Fair magazine. But Mia Farrow’s claim that Ronan might actually be the son of her first husband, Frank Sinatra, drowned out those claims.
Dylan wrote a harrowing statement detailing her accusations. The ensuing debate over the allegations — and how to handle them — has split newsrooms and journalists of all ideological stripes.
The Los Angeles Times declined to publish Farrow’s article, according to The Wrap, and Politico reports that the New York Times editorial department decided against printing it as its own column.
Farrow’s statement appeared instead, verbatim, on Times columnist Nicholas Kristof’s blog. He also excerpted it heavily in his column.
In doing so, says Kelly McBride, a media ethics scholar at the Poynter Institute, “[Kristof] turned his column over and gave her his authority. And the reality is, if this had been a memoir written by someone who was claiming to have been abused by an unknown person — somebody whose name we didn’t recognize — we would have no objections to that at all.
“But because Woody Allen has a reputation out there, we somehow feel like his right to protect his reputation trumps her right to tell her story,” says McBride, who has written extensively about the coverage of sexual abuse. “And I don’t think it does.”
Kristof declined to talk to NPR about his decision to publish Farrow’s statement.
Sexual Abuse, Public Figures And The Media
Kristof became a friend of Mia Farrow and Ronan Farrow, now an MSNBC host, through their human rights activism. But some critics, including the Times public editor, Margaret Sullivan, questioned whether such a one-sided account was fair.
Slate senior editor Jessica Winter wrote critically about Weide’s Daily Beast article. She contends that past journalistic norms of fairness often protect people accused of sexual abuse — and that the victims should come first.
“Not to bring everything back to social media, but I saw a lot of people on Facebook and Twitter sharing the Daily Beast piece as a kind of rebuttal to Dylan Farrow’s open letter,” she says. “I found it very strange that people thought that those two voices should be equal.
“It’s important to me — and I think it’s important to a lot of women and important to a lot of people in general, to default to a position of solidarity to survivors of sexual abuse and sexual assault,” Winter adds.
Even within newsrooms, the question has sparked debate. Winter’s Slate colleague Dahlia Lithwick argues that the revived allegations against Allen have prompted disputation, not journalism.
Lithwick decries what she’s called “litigation by hashtag,” instead advocating a balance of presumption of innocence with respectful treatment of those who say they have been abused.
“We have to — we just have to, even though it hurts — go into a situation where we say, ‘You know, a little humility.’ We don’t know everything, and until we know everything, let’s hold both ideas in our heads even though they pinch a little bit. … I’m not sure that in the absence of any rules of the road, this gets us to the truth.”
This weekend, The New York Times is expected to publish a response from Allen. [Copyright 2014 NPR]