As Jihadists Spread, Connecting The Dots Proves Hard
Filed by KOSU News in US News.
October 26, 2012
More than a year after popular protests rocked the Arab world, U.S. intelligence officials are struggling to understand the myriad of Islamist groups that have filled the vacuum.
Those groups run the gamut from moderate believers who are willing to give the political process a try, to violent extremists. The difficulty is figuring out which is which.
The day after the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee, told CNN, “There are still some fuzzy details, that I think we’ll have resolved in the next few days to have a for sure and for certain. But clearly it has all the hallmarks of an al-Qaida style event.”
In the weeks since, it has become clear that multiple groups were involved — and that highlights a significant challenge for counter-terrorism officials: Not all Islamist groups are al-Qaida.
Al-Qaida Links: Only Part Of The Equation
Over the past decade, policy makers focused on what jihadists had in common with Osama bin Laden’s terrorist organization. And that approached seemed to bear fruit, says Christopher Swift, a professor of law at the University of Virginia. “In the process … we’ve discovered a lot of linkages and relationships,” he says.
But while the relationships between groups are important, he says, their differences are, too.
“Those distinctions can be very important in helping us understand who’s operating where, what their objectives are, whether they buy into the al-Qaida ideology and whether they have any kind of meaningful operational relationship with al-Qaida,” Swift says.
That last notion, of meaningful operational relationships, is what really concerns U.S. officials. In Mali, local groups have ties to al-Qaida, and the group’s North African affiliate is now helping run two-thirds of the country.
But J. Peter Pham, director of the Africa Center at the Atlantic Council, warns Mali is a place where the U.S. should avoid assuming that all Islamists are in step with al-Qaida.
“Because the key to solving the crisis in Mali is nuance,” Pham says. “Dividing … the various groups and distinguishing those you can work with, those that have to be opposed and those in-between.”
There are important distinctions to be made among Islamists elsewhere as well. In Syria, for example, a number of Islamist groups are fighting the Assad regime. Because they have a common enemy, the patchwork of rebels and Islamists that make up the Free Syrian Army are willing to accommodate al-Qaida. But ideologically and politically, the groups have huge differences.
The University of Virginia’s Christopher Swift says those tensions “are important because they provide an opportunity for engagement — to understand what these groups want, and which … can be broken off from these temporary coalitions with al-Qaida.”
In other words, the counter-terrorism version of “divide and conquer.”
In Libya Attack, Complex Ties
As for the Benghazi attack, the group thought to be largely responsible is Ansar al-Sharia, a local Islamist militia that is not an arm of al-Qaida, though some of its members share the group’s ideology.
This week, Tunisia announced that it had made the first arrest in connection with the attack: a 28-year-old Tunisian man — who’s not a member of al-Qaida either.
All of which underscores how important, and how complex, it has become for counter-terrorism officials grappling with the changing nature of extremism in North Africa and the Middle East to understand the differences among Islamist groups.
The lesson that’s emerging: If there’s a terrorist attack, you can’t just assume it’s al-Qaida. [Copyright 2012 National Public Radio]