The State Of Syria: Civil War Or Vicious Stalemate?
Filed by KOSU News in World News.
January 26, 2012
One thing that’s certain about the uprising against Syrian President Bashar Assad is that there is nothing romantic about it.
Unlike Egypt, there’s no Tahrir Square filled with hundreds of thousands of people calling for democracy. Unlike Libya, there’s no Mad Max warriors in the desert fighting a dictator with guns they’ve welded to the backs of their pickup trucks.
Instead, grim news seeps out piecemeal from unofficial sources. The government has largely barred the international media, and most of the reports are little more than body counts, with most of the fatalities blamed on the Syrian security forces.
Analysts in the region say since the uprising began last March, the Syrian regime has been expert at keeping the violence just low enough that the story doesn’t burst onto the international stage.
But that doesn’t mean the situation has been getting less violent. In fact, it’s worsening by the day, while the protest movement remains steadfast in its call for the downfall of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Assad’s government continues to crack down — violently — on protesters. Now soldiers are defecting from the Syrian army and fighting on behalf of the protesters. More and more, the conflict is at risk of turning into something that no one wants — a civil war.
Assad’s Vow To Crush Enemies
Last month, the Arab League decided to send a group of observers to Syria as part of a peace plan to slow the regime’s brutal suppression. But that didn’t work. Activists say hundreds more people were killed, even while the observers were there.
Assad then made one of his first speeches in months. But instead of offering some kind of concession — a promise of real reform or acknowledging the protest movement even exits — the Syrian president vowed to crush his enemies with an iron fist.
The Arab League mission looked doomed.
Then, earlier this week, the Cairo-based league came up with a new plan. It calls for Assad to transfer power to a deputy who would oversee a national unity government. Parliamentary elections would follow.
The Syrian regime immediately rejected the plan. Assad, it appeared, is nowhere near stepping down.
Salvaging Arab League Plan
But neither, analysts say, was the president of Yemen at first. It took months of a massive uprising that was also turning violent in President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s country before he finally handed power to his vice president. Just this week, Saleh traveled to the U.S. for medical treatment. Some believe it was his quiet exit from power.
Paul Salem heads the Carnegie Center for Middle East Peace in Beirut. He says there are two reasons the Arab League plan for Syria might actually be useful.
“One is that it’s on the table. So if in a few of months the regime is really in trouble, they have a fallback option … rather than utter collapse they can say, ‘Well, let’s discuss something middle of the road’ and save parts of the regime or parts of themselves,” Salem says.
That’s what the former president of Yemen did.
Secondly, Salem says he thinks it helps undermine the regime’s propaganda, which is “that there is no middle way, this is a conspiracy, the Arabs are out to get us, and we have to fight. Here, the Arabs say, ‘No, we’re not out to get you, we’re proposing a very reasonable way forward that actually saves you.
It also saves the country from all-out war.
New Approach Needed
Now, diplomats from Arab countries and Europe, the U.S. and Turkey are pushing for a U.N. Security Council resolution that uses this Arab League plan as a framework.
While that might sound like more paper-pushing that would fail to stop the violence on the ground, Peter Harling of the International Crisis Group says it’s the right next step.
“The only way to convince this regime it’s about time to negotiate and not simply to talk about possible reforms is to have a consensus within the international community,” says Harling, who is based in Damascus.
Up to now, the Assad regime has been bolstered by the fact that Russia threatens to veto a Security Council resolution on Syria.
Harling says the time has come for Arabs and the West to draft a resolution the Russians can accept — a resolution that would write off any possibility of a Libya-style intervention — but one that still blames the Syrian regime for the crisis.
“And that approach would be extremely welcome in terms of forcing the regime to realize it cannot just forge ahead with its current course of action that will lead the country towards disaster,” he says.
U.N. officials say the resolution could be voted on as early as next week. [Copyright 2012 National Public Radio]