Current Weather
The Spy FM

Facing Stiffened Opposition, Obama Goes It Alone

Filed by KOSU News in US News.
October 31, 2011

President Obama, faced with what he described as an “increasingly dysfunctional” Congress, has turned repeatedly in recent weeks to the time-honored, but often controversial executive order to unilaterally make policy.

On Monday, Obama signed an executive order designed to require drug companies to report anticipated manufacturing shortages in advance. Last week, he said he would issue an executive order designed to help ease home-refinancing rules. And earlier in the same week, the president issued a directive to cap student loan payments.

The moves bear more than a slight resemblance to a strategy adopted by President Clinton, who issued a slew of executive orders ahead of the 1996 election. But Clinton was far from the only president to use the strategy.

“I think it’s taking a page from a lot of previous presidents, frankly,” said William Howell, a professor of American politics at the University of Chicago.

“When presidents can’t get stuff done, they can’t advance a policy agenda … they have a strong incentive to exercise these unilateral powers,” he said.

The executive order almost always generates controversy. There’s no explicit authorization in the Constitution for presidents to issue executive orders, but there is a grant of executive power that allows the president to ensure that “laws be faithfully executed.”

The first executive order was issued by President George Washington in 1789. Some of the most famous and infamous acts of government came in the form of executive orders – everything from Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s order to detain Japanese-Americans during World War II.

Presidents Give And Take Away

Even though the orders can be — and frequently are — easily rescinded by a succeeding president of another party, they can make short-term political points with a public that expects its president “to get things done,” Howell says.

And while Congress could block an executive order either by passing legislation opposing it outright or simply refusing to fund it, the president still has a veto.

The executive order “tends to be used in those cases where the president says, ‘Look, I can’t produce majorities or supermajorities required to enact legislation … but the opposition isn’t so strong that if I just set policy that they will be able to overturn it,” Howell said.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, agreed. “The fact is a president knows that for a great many things that he does, Congress would be hard-pressed to mount an opposition or overcome a veto,” Turley said.

That still leaves the possibility of judicial challenge, which is what happened in 1952 when the Supreme Court ruled that President Truman didn’t have the authority to order the seizure of steel mills during a nationwide labor strike. In 1996, a federal appeals panel nullified an executive order from Clinton to prevent the U.S. government from contracting with organizations that hired strikebreakers.

In recent years, however, the Supreme Court has generally made it harder to challenge a president’s actions, Turley said, leaving the president with “unchecked power.”

“That’s an extremely dangerous thing for a system based on checks and balances,” Turley said.

“Particularly starting from Bill Clinton and later we have seen more of these controversial executive orders,” he said. “George W. Bush also issued a great number. Particularly after 9/11, we have seen more and more.”

“The problem is that half the public is always happy with the executive order in our divided politics, so all the Democrats who were greatly aggrieved by George W. Bush’s executive orders are now conspicuously silent,” he said.

Turley said Obama’s claim that “we can’t wait” for Congress was “the worst possible defense” for the use of executive orders — one that appears to justify defying the legislative branch. But Howell sees one recent example where the president might have done well to brandish the power, yet did not.

“I for one thought it was something of a mistake that Obama didn’t at least threaten to unilaterally lift the debt ceiling,” he said. “The mere threat of doing so might have informed the whole debate between the president and Congress.” [Copyright 2011 National Public Radio]

Leave a Reply

5AM to 9AM Morning Edition

Morning Edition

For more than two decades, NPR's Morning Edition has prepared listeners for the day ahead with two hours of up-to-the-minute news, background analysis, commentary, and coverage of arts and sports.

Listen Live Now!

9AM to 10AM The Takeaway

The Takeaway

A fresh alternative in morning news, "The Takeaway" provides a breadth and depth of world, national and regional news coverage that is unprecedented in public media.

View the program guide!

10AM to 11PM On Point

On Point

On Point unites distinct and provocative voices with passionate discussion as it confronts the stories that are at the center of what is important in the world today. Leaving no perspective unchallenged, On Point digs past the surface and into the core of a subject, exposing each of its real world implications.

View the program guide!

Upcoming Events in your area (Submit your event today!)

Streaming audio and podcasts

Stream KOSU on your smartphone

Phone Streaming

SmartPhone listening options on this page are intended for many iPhones, Blackberries, etc. with low-cost software applications available to listen to our full-time web streams, both News on KOSU-1 and Classical on KOSU-2.

Learn more about our complete range of streaming services

We're perfecting the patient experience - Stillwater Medical Center