Filed by KOSU News in Health.
November 16, 2009

In something of a reversal, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended that the average woman wait until age 50 to begin routine screening for breast cancer, and only get screened every two years. The previous recommendations — in place since 2002 and backed by the American Cancer Society, radiologists and health professionals — said women should begin routine screening at age 40. Now, to the consternation of some in those groups, the task force says the overall benefit of screening women ages 40 to 49 don’t outweigh the risks.

The new guidelines also say that women need not perform breast self-examinations. Some studies find that they lead to more mammograms and biopsies that haven’t been shown to have any benefit. Additionally, mammography screening of women older than 75 is not considered necessary, since women may be diagnosed with a cancer that is unlikely to cause a problem in their lifetime.

These guidelines are not for women who have a higher risk of breast cancer, says task force Vice Chairwoman Diane Petitti. Mammograms shouldn’t be done without doctors fully informing women of the benefits and risk, she says. It’s a conversation that they need to have before they make the decision.

Weighing Harm With Saving Lives

The task force looked at a number of recent studies done in the United Kingdom, Sweden and at six cancer centers here in the United States, all of which achieved about the same result. They found that the deaths from breast cancer were reduced by about 15 percent for women who start screening both at age 40 and 50. But cases of breast cancer rise with age.

Women who start at 40 however are much more likely to experience the anxiety of an abnormal mammogram, which suggests a woman might have cancer when she doesn’t and have to have additional screening. She may have to undergo a biopsy and not have cancer, or she could be over diagnosed and have a tumor that never harms her.

“If saving lives is the only goal then doing more screening will save more lives,” says Jeanne Mandelblatt, of Georgetown University, the lead author of the modeling conducted by the cancer centers. A larger societal goal that has to be considered, she says, is whether the cost of saving lives is worth the harm caused.

It’s a risk that American Cancer Society’s Terri Fontham is willing to live with. She’s had an abnormal breast mammogram and had to be screened again. She says, “Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. It’s the number two (cancer) killer,” Fontham says. “Despite the increased anxiety, the bottom line is saving lives.”

Key Groups Divided On New Guidelines

Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Radiologists also say they will continue to recommend that women get mammograms every one or two years after age 40.

Women in the United States are being diagnosed with breast cancer earlier than their mothers were, as well as women in certain minority groups, says ACR chairwoman Dr. Constance Lehman. “Black women in the U.S. develop breast cancer at a significantly younger age than Caucasian women do.” This was not addressed or acknowledged by the task force, she says.

Some groups and experts welcome the task force guidelines, including the American Academy of Family Physicians.

“There are no studies that indicate that mammograms will reduce the deaths from aggressive tumors in young women. “It’s not whether women under 50 get breast cancer. They do,” says Dr. Susan Love, an author and UCLA clinical professor of surgery.

“The question is whether mammography is the best way to find them and really change the outcome,” she says. She would put more money into understanding why women develop breast cancer and in treating it.

More than half of all women between 40 to 65 years get mammography to screen for breast cancer. Mammography is considered one factor in the continuing decline of breast cancer deaths. Copyright 2009 National Public Radio